Have a look at this description of this rubric that is different to get more detail on the distinction between analytical and holistic rubrics
Not long ago I finished a marathon of grading portfolios, and grading revised portfolios for my students. It’s a stressful and time that is busy but the one thing I’m very happy about may be the method in which my use of holistic rubrics allows us to focus this grading focus on student growth in reading, writing and thinking.
A couple of years ago I used rubrics that are analytical.
They are the rubrics that function more like a checklist, where students will get 10 points due to their thesis statement, and then get 7 points because of their usage of evidence. A holistic rubric however, generally describes what an item (such as an essay, analysis paragraph etc.)
appears like at each and every level, similar to this example from my “Analysis writing rubric that is”
- Student identifies details which are strongly related the written text overall 1 and that clearly hook up to one another, even though connection may be less interesting or clear than during the Honor Roll level.
- Student accurately describes the literary device(s) (aka “writer’s moves”) discussed
- Student clearly and accurately describes an essential idea through the text overall 1 , although the >may not be a nuanced interpretation. However, the interpretation continues to be abstract, although not clichйd.
- Student cites ev >attempts to use us in the most way that is useful
- Student completely explains the connections between details (ev >attempting to utilize words that are signal describe relationships between ideas
Although the bullet points make this rubric look a little more “analytical,” the truth is that i take advantage of it in holistic way. We have just unearthed that students fine it easier to grasp a rubric that is split up into pieces, in the place of two long and complex sentences that describe essentially the idea that is same.
After using these rubrics for 2 years (with a few minor revisions in language) I have seen them help students grow far more than my analytical rubrics ever did, and even though I don’t spend enough time “teaching” the rubrics to my students. Listed here is why I’m now such a fan of these rubrics that are holistic the way they are now actually facilitating the improvement of student writing instead of simply recording it.
1) Feedback, not grades, may be the goal. Holistic rubrics support this. Through almost all of a phrase I give students in my own class tons of feedback on the writing and feedback that is minimal grades. They are able to get a 100 away from 100 for simply completing an essay, even though it still needs a lot of development. Because my rubric is holistic and associated with terms like “Meet Expectations” rather than giving points for various areas of the writing, it really is easier for students to understand how their first draft needs revision that is substantial order to “meet expectations” and even though their completion grade (which uses points instead) is 100/100.
2) Good writing and mediocre writing can have the same score on an analytical rubric. I’ve run into this issue time and time again.When I used analytical rubrics to grade essays I often unearthed that simple, formulaic writing with a 1-sentence thesis statement and some basic evidence with some bit of explanation often received exactly the same point value as writing where the student made a more nuanced point, or used more interesting evidence that connected into the thesis in interesting ways, or higher important developed from the beginning into the end. Often it was since the categories I measured were actually just areas of the essay: one category for thesis statement, one category for evidence, one category for reasoning, etc. Along with these parts separated there was clearly no way that is good of how well the writing flowed or was created. In addition meant there was no simple method on my analytical rubric there was no great way to recapture how students were taking risks, and important element of writing development.
3) Holistic rubrics are just better at assessing the real way that the components of an essay come together. When the essay that is wholeor any piece of writing) is described together it became easier for me personally to parse out the thing that custom writings reviews was strong and weak about student writing. Take a example that is recent I was giving students feedback about a fairly standard essay about the memoir Night. When I was reading student essays and considering what feedback they had a need to move up ion the rubric, I quickly realized that their reasoning and explanation of their evidence needed more work. More specifically, students were basically paraphrasing their evidence rather than actually explaining how it supported their thesis. I would have thought this was an isolated problem in the “reasoning” section when I used to use analytical rubrics. However, because I became using a holistic rubric and looking during the essay more as a complete, I realized that part of the reason the student reasoning was lacking was because their thesis statements were overly simplistic. If you have an overly simplistic, obvious thesis statement it is difficult to develop interesting reasoning because, really, that which was their interesting to state? Thanks to this holistic view I was able to give students feedback that helped them develop a stronger thesis and then revise their reasoning accordingly.